These videos popped up on Youtube recently:
The first video presents this solution to the 340 cipher:
(more…)
I recently saw this post on Twitter:
Sounds like a joke at first. But someone really did pay to place this ad in the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper:
It appeared in the December 21, 2012 paper, and appeared three more times on successive Fridays.
The ad provoked my curiosity, so I called Daryll to ask him about his solution. He is a very friendly, older gentleman who lives in upstate New York. He said he has no background in code breaking, apart from working codes as a hobby in the free time resulting from his retirement. He took out the ad in the San Francisco Chronicle
I received my copy recently. You can see his worksheets here:
(more…)
In his book Zodiac, Robert Graysmith makes this claim about the Zodiac’s 408-character cryptogram:
Fifty-five characters comprise a very complicated cipher. Was this a totally original code or had Zodiac used other sources to build his cipher system? If he had used particular books on code, perhaps these could be traced back to him.
I began by looking for basic books on secret writing. In the preface to The Codebreakers by David Kahn a sample cipher alphabet is presented; eight of the twenty-six suggested equivalents had been used by the killer. The Zodiac must have had a copy of this book.
That is a very strong conclusion. Is it true? Here’s the sample cipher from Kahn’s book:
So, if you use Kahn’s cipher alphabet on the message “CAT”, you’d get “QLK.”
Graysmith says Zodiac used eight of those equivalents. But if you look at the key to the 408-character cipher,
he really only used three of the equivalents:
(more…)
Wired Magazine reminds us of humanity’s failure to unlock the secrets of seven famous codes in their recent article, “7 Codes You’ll Never Ever Break“.
The list features some of the usual well-known mysteries, including the Zodiac Killer’s 340-character cryptogram. Which we’ll never ever break. Unless you prove them wrong. You’re working on that, right?
I’m curious to know who wrote the Concerned Citizen key, a mysterious correspondence that produces an accurate solution to the Zodiac Killer’s 3-part cryptogram. The key was sent to the police a day after the Hardens’ solution was published in the newspapers. Was it derived from the published solution? Was it an independent solve? Did it come from the killer himself? Maybe if we compare the key to the Hardens’ solution, picking through all the errors and oddities, we can gain some insight into how the Concerned Citizen key was created
I haven’t come to any conclusions, but here are the results of the analysis, which became more extensive than I originally planned:
Detailed analysis of Harden solution and Concerned Citizen key
Here’s some of the information you’ll find there:
- A detailed, annotated solution to the cipher based on the Hardens’ worksheets.
The annotations link to notes containing many observations about the various errors and other interesting information gained directly from the Hardens’ worksheets. - The Harden key, showing cipher to plain text assignments:
Plain text to cipher assignments:
And a visualization of homophone cycles:
- Detailed differences between the Hardens’ solution and the Concerned Citizen key
- FBI cryptanalysis and interpretation
The following is a summary of the findings (many of these have been discussed before; see [1] and [2]):
(more…)
On July 31, 1969, the Zodiac killer mailed three letters to three different San Francisco newspapers. Each letter included details about his recent murders, and a third of his 408-character cryptogram. The pieces of the cryptogram were soon published, and in less than a week, Donald and Bettye Harden had already solved the cryptogram. Their solution was published in the San Francisco Chronicle on August 9, 1969. “I’m convinced he has it solved”, said Detective Sergeant John Lynch, who was in charge of the case at the time.
The Hardens’ solution is well-known, but Sergeant Lynch also received a lesser-known solution to the cryptogram, sent in the mail on August 10th by a “concerned citizen”, and obtained last year via the valiant FOIA efforts of morf:
The card was sent one day after the Hardens solution became publicly known via the Chronicle article. With the card came this sheet of paper showing a substitution key to the 408-character cryptogram:
Last year, USC machine translation specialist Kevin Knight and his group of researchers cracked the “Copiale cipher”, 105 pages of mysterious enciphered text from the 18th century. Yesterday, Wired published this fascinating and detailed account of how it all went down, and what’s happened since then:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/11/ff-the-manuscript/all/
The decoding effort started as a sort of game between two friends that eventually engulfed a team of experts in disciplines ranging from machine translation to intellectual history. Its significance goes far beyond the contents of a single cipher. Hidden within coded manuscripts like these is a secret history of how esoteric, often radical notions of science, politics, and religion spread underground.
Uncovering the meaning of the mysterious symbols was only the first piece of a deeper puzzle: Understanding the organizations that spent so much time developing cryptographic methods to hide their rituals from the world.
After reading the Oculists’ cipher, Önnerfors suggested that it described one of the more extreme groups. Forget the implicit threats to the state or church. In part of the Copiale, there’s explicit talk about slaying the tyrannical “three-headed monster” who “deprive[s] man of his natural freedom.” There’s even a call for a “general revolt.” Remember, Önnerfors told the code-breakers, this book was written in the 1740s—30 years before the Declaration of Independence. “To someone at the time,” he added, “this would be like reading a manifesto from a terrorist organization.”
The Copiale cipher turned out to be a homophonic substitution cipher, the same general technique Zodiac used to construct his 408-character cipher. Kevin and his team have also studied the Zodiac ciphers, and I’m hopeful they will continue to give them some academic attention. They have also published a fascinating review of what we know about the Voynich Manuscript, the book containing 240 pages of bizarre symbols that have remained undeciphered for about 600 years. As Kevin’s team, and other researchers like them, continue to improve their decipherment and translation technologies, we can hope to unlock even more mysteries, perhaps even the Zodiac ciphers.
“Serial killers provide the frights at N.Y. haunted house”
Exploitative entertainment? Or innocent Halloween fun?
Özcan Türkmen, a German-born software engineer and art critic living in Turkey, recently published this solution for the unsolved 340-character cipher:
You can click the text above to read Türkmen’s article about how he came up with the solution. You can also read a Turkish-language article reporting on his solution.
Unfortunately, this solution suffers from the overuse of anagrams, which permit too many alternative solutions. With so many alternative solutions, we can’t determine which solution is correct, without stronger evidence.
To illustrate this weakness, consider the plaintext “AORDLIDKNMSFCIN” which appears in his solution. This stream of plaintext occurs when Türkmen applies his substitution key to the cipher text, which Türkmen re-arranges to form the phrase “LRD OF SIC MANKIND”. While this phrase seems vaguely Zodiac-like, look at all the other words that can also be made from the very same letters:
INFRASONIC, INSOMNIAC, CRIMINALS, IRONCLADS, MANDOLINS, MANIFOLDS, AIRLOCKS, MANIKINS, ANDIRONS, INSOMNIA, MANIFOLD, ANDROIDS, CLARIONS, MANDRILS, MIDLANDS, AIRFOILS, INFORMAL, CORDIALS, CRIMINAL, CALDRONS, DISCLAIM, CALFSKIN, IRONCLAD, SARDONIC, IRONICAL, DIAMONDS, MANDOLIN, CONFIRMS, ORDINALS, CALDRON, MANIOCS, MANSION, DIRNDLS, ANDROID, ODALISK, MIKADOS, NOMINAL, MAFIOSI, NIMRODS, MARLINS, MANKIND, CONFIRM, FORMALS, NORMALS, KINSMAN, MICRONS, MACRONS, AMNIONS, MIDAIRS, MANIKIN, NIACINS, INSOFAR, AIRFOIL, FINICAL, FINIALS, SIRLOIN, INNARDS, CORDIAL, INLANDS, ANIONIC, INFOLDS, DOMAINS, DIAMOND, LIAISON, FLORINS, ANDIRON, INFORMS, ALMONDS, AIRLOCK, SILICON, CLARION, FROLICS, FALCONS, INCISOR, CANDORS, INROADS, CLAMORS, MISLAID, NONACID, CRIMSON, ORDAINS, NOMADIC, KAOLINS, DISCARD, MINIONS, MANDRIL, MIDLAND, DISDAIN, DISCORD, AIRSICK, OILSKIN, SIMILAR, NONSKID, ORDINAL, RADIOS, ORDAIN, FROCKS, FAKIRS, MICROS, CANDID, MIKADO, FLICKS, DOMAIN, NADIRS, SALMON, ACORNS, FORMIC, CALIFS, DISMAL, FINIAL, CAROMS, RANDOM, CRANKS, DAMSON, LAIRDS, RAISIN, DISARM, MOLARS, ROMANS, DIRNDL, FIASCO, MIDAIR, CASINO, RADONS, RANCID, NORMAL, CAROLS, CLAIMS, FISCAL, ANIONS, INLAND, RACISM, FRONDS, DORSAL, MACRON, RANSOM, CLOAKS, CLINKS, DRINKS, FINALS, SILICA, AMNION, FRANCS, MARLIN, FLAIRS, ADORNS, FLACKS, NIMROD, FLORAS, CANONS, FLOCKS, MANIOC, SOLIDI, INLAID, CLONKS, FLANKS, CORALS, INROAD, CONMAN, ALMOND, MICRON, CANDOR, CLAMOR, KARMIC, MACROS, SIMIAN, FIORDS, SAILOR, NORDIC, FLORIN, MANICS, SOCIAL, FLORID, NOMADS, MODALS, MORALS, FROLIC, SORDID, CLANKS, FORMAL, FALCON, DINARS, IRONIC, INFOLD, IDIOMS, MINORS, KIDDOS, NIACIN, MOSAIC, MANORS, KAOLIN, CROAKS, ISLAND, MISDID, FRANKS, DRAINS, MINION, CAIRNS, INFIRM, INFORM, CRAMS, NARKS, NAIFS, SNARL, CILIA, NORMS, MONKS, SICKO, ADORN, CALMS, FOLKS, SCRIM, MORNS, RAIDS, SNAIL, RANIS, COALS, KINDA, FLACK, MANIC, CLANS, CLONK, DIDOS, ADIOS, DRAMS, ROAMS, COLAS, MINOR, MINKS, CRANK, MINIS, ORALS, INFOS, AMIRS, CLAMS, FIORD, FROND, MILKS, RINDS, CLAIM, FLANS, DIALS, CORAL, IRONS, OINKS, DRANK, MIDIS, CAROM, RADIO, CAROL, CLODS, FIRMS, COLDS, SCORN, MICRO, MICRA, MICAS, RAILS, ARSON, DARNS, MOILS, NARCS, FAKIR, NAILS, SCARF, FINIS, FAILS, MARKS, FOCAL, ANION, NODAL, SCION, CLANK, LAIRD, CAIRN, SOLID, DAMNS, NICKS, SOLAR, FINKS, LACKS, DADOS, FLASK, FOLDS, COIFS, ROMAN, RADII, COMAS, RADON, RIALS, MAILS, DOCKS, SCALD, ACORN, MISDO, CALIF, FRAIL, CALFS, MORAL, FLOCK, DORMS, MACRO, SNACK, RAINS, INFRA, LORIS, LORDS, DIRKS, LOINS, FINAL, LOCKS, ACRID, RANKS, LOANS, MOLDS, LOAMS, DARKS, LOAFS, DICKS, LOADS, MILDS, CORNS, LIRAS, SLINK, LIONS, CANON, LINKS, IONIC, LIMOS, ROANS, LIMNS, SCROD, FRANC, LIDOS, FORMS, DRINK, LICKS, SMACK, LIARS, FORKS, MOCKS, FORDS, LARKS, RICKS, LARDS, DORKS, ICONS, MASON, LANDS, CALKS, ROSIN, SCRAM, LAIRS, ROCKS, FINDS, CORDS, SLACK, SKOAL, RACKS, FILMS, FARMS, ROILS, DISCO, CONKS, MOANS, KRONA, KOLAS, MANOR, SCOLD, KINDS, FLANK, CORKS, OKRAS, KILOS, DINAR, KILNS, CLOAK, MAIDS, FLORA, KIDDO, ORCAS, MAINS, NOMAD, CORMS, ROADS, MARLS, MOLAR, SMIRK, SMOCK, FAIRS, FLAIR, FOILS, SLICK, CLINK, SLAIN, FLICK, DONAS, FAROS, FRANK, FOAMS, COINS, CARDS, MINDS, CROAK, NADIR, RINKS, IDIOM, FOALS, DRAIN, FRISK, SALON, SONAR, IKONS, CODAS, SONIC, ACIDS, MODAL, FROCK, COILS, IDOLS
Even after leaving out all the shorter words (less than five letters long), there are 420 words to draw from. You can create all sorts of stories with so many words to choose from. How can we possibly know for sure which words might be the ones Zodiac intentionally selected? And that chunk of plaintext is just one of many places in which Türkmen arbitrarily re-arranged. Many thousands of additional words are possible if you re-arrange the sections in which Türkmen allowed anagramming.
Türkmen’s solution also takes many subjective liberties with interpretation of the plaintext, such as “PAOL” meaning “PAUL”, “PRISIDIO” meaning “PRESIDIO”, “D” representing “THE”, “LRD OF SIC” translating to “LORD OF SICK”, “KILLD” meaning “KILLED”, and “AM PSIKO” meaning “AM PSYCHO”. Similar liberties are also taken by other discredited solutions, such as Graysmith’s famous solution. Another common quality of these solutions is that the plaintext resembles a kind of halting language resembling “baby talk”. The reason for this is because shorter phrases are much easier to produce via anagramming than longer ones. And this forces unrelated and non-sequitor phrases to appear next to each other.
The Zodiac killer very likely did something unusual, or even insane, to the 340 cipher text to make it resist attack all these years. But we still need to use sanity to discover which insane method he might have used. Could he have used this kind of anagramming technique when writing up his plaintext? I believe it is unlikely, but possible. But if he did, it will be nearly impossible to prove it, because so many alternative solutions can be generated with the same technique.
Everybody likes a good story. Well, once again, the Corey Starliper story, which is over a year old, is enjoying another new round of attention:
The evidence is quite clear that anyone could use Corey’s decryption technique to invent their own creepy hidden messages and claim that they, too, have uncovered something left for them by the Zodiac killer among the mysterious symbols. Unfortunately, this little detail doesn’t inflict the same rush of excitement as believing the story at face value. The allure of unsolved mysteries is too great to overcome popular, unskeptical thinking.
Francis Bacon understood this weakness about us, almost 400 years ago:
The human understanding is no dry light, but receives infusion from the will and affections; whence proceed sciences which may be called ‘sciences as one would’. For what a man had rather were true he more readily believes. Therefore he rejects difficult things from impatience of research; sober things, because they narrow hope; the deeper things of nature, from superstition; the light of experience, from arrogance and pride; things not commonly believed, out of deference to the opinion of the vulgar. Numberless in short are the ways, and sometimes imperceptible, in which the affections colour and infect the understanding.
– Francis Bacon, Novum Organon (1620)
And numberless are the ways phantoms appear, deliberately and otherwise, within the strange cipher symbols, leading many to a ruinous path of conviction. Here is a more recent example:
http://zodiac340cipher.thoughts.com/posts/zodiac-killer-s-340-cipher-cracked-now
Once again, someone who has found a handful of interesting words and phrases in the plain text has reached the conclusion that their decryption attempt is correct. Unfortunately, anyone can produce decryptions of the 340 cipher with a handful of interesting words and phrases. I’ve seen very many such solutions over the years. They all have some readable text, scattered in large swaths of gibberish. These solutions are easy to produce because if you allow a solution to contain a lot of gibberish, you can plug whatever you want into other parts of the cipher. From the thousands of such decryptions, how do you figure out which one is right?
Corey Starliper went a step beyond this, and decided to eliminate the constraints of the cipher text altogether, freeing him to squeeze in his invented plain text.
A frequent objection to this kind of analysis goes something like this: We can’t assume that Zodiac was a rational person, who would use a methodical encryption technique that could be easily understood or accepted. Wouldn’t he use some kind of crazy codemaking scheme that doesn’t make sense?
This is an acceptable objection. Yes, he very well could have done something insane to produce the sequence of symbols we see in the 340 cipher. But you still have to figure out which insane method is the correct one, because there are millions of them to select from!
Just because the Zodiac killer may have abandoned reason, doesn’t mean we should.
Recent Comments